Size at Sexual Maturity

Size at sexual maturity is generally taken as the size (carapace length) at which 50% of animals will be sexually mature, also known as CL50. In females, sexual maturity is assigned based on reproductive state; namely the presence of a spermatophore and/or egg mass. For males, assigning sexual maturity is more difficult as there is no obvious external indicator. However, research has indicated that sexual maturity can be assigned based on a change in the relationship between the length of the male merus of the second pereiopod (the segment closest to the body of the second walking leg, Image 1) and carapace length (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006).

Image 1. Measuring the merus of a male lobster, (DPIRD 2005)

Mean Size at Sexual Maturity

Females 65.0 mm – 87.5 mm  (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006)

Males 72.2 mm – 95.3 mm  (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006)

Females reach sexual maturity at smaller sizes than males, generally by around 5 – 10 mm  (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006). Because juvenile males and females appear to have similar growth rates, this difference indicates that females reach sexual maturity younger than males. The wide range in the size of maturity found in western rock lobsters is due to the broad temperature regime found off Western Australia.

Water temperature

Size at sexual maturity generally increases with latitude, i.e. larger in the south and smaller in the north. Females reach sexual maturity (CL50) at 87.5 mm in Fremantle, decreasing to 74.9 mm in Dongara, and 65.0 mm at the offshore Abrolhos Islands. Males exhibit the same pattern, with an CL50 of 95.3 mm at Fremantle, 84.6 mm in Dongara, and 72.2 mm at the Abrolhos. (Figures 1 and 2).

This variation has been attributed to the latitudinal gradient in water temperature throughout the lobster’s distribution. There is a strong correlation between size at sexual maturity and water temperature, with smaller size at sexual maturity obtained in warmer temperatures (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006). Because lobsters grow faster in warmer waters, not slower, variation in growth rates is unable to explain this pattern. Instead, lobsters must be smaller because they experience precocious maturation in warmer waters, maturing at a younger age and therefore a smaller carapace length (Johnston et al. 2008, Melville-Smith et al. 2010, de Lestang 2018)

Figure 1. Logistic regressions fitted to the percentage of mature female Panulirus cygnus at different carapace lengths in six locations in Western Australia. CL50±1 SE denotes the size at which 50% of the assemblage is mature and “n” the sample size.  (Figure from (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006)).
Figure 2. Relationship between the merus length of the second pereiopod and carapace length of immature (open circle) and mature (filled circle) male P. cygnus (left) and logistic regressions fitted to the percentage of mature males at different carapace lengths (right) in six locations in Western Australia. CL50±1 SE denotes the size at which 50% of the assemblage is mature and “n” the sample size. (Figure from (Melville-Smith & de Lestang 2006).

References

Johnston D, Melville-Smith R, Hendriks B, Phillips B (2008) Growth rates and survival of western rock lobster (Panulirus cygnus) at two temperatures (ambient and 23 °C) and two feeding frequencies. Aquaculture 279:77–84.

de Lestang S (2018) Could warming oceans and increased lobster biomass rates be affecting growth rates in Australia’s largest lobster fishery? Bull Mar Sci 94:1055–1075.

Melville-Smith R, de Lestang S (2006) Spatial and temporal variation in the size at maturity of the western rock lobster Panulirus cygnus George. Mar Biol 150:183–195.

Melville-Smith R, de Lestang S, Johnston DJ (2010) Higher water temperature leads to precocious maturation of western rock lobsters (Panulirus cygnus), but are things that simple? J Mar Biol Assoc India 52:257–263.

Page last updated: June 27, 2022